‘By-the-wind sailor’ jellies wash ashore in massive numbers after warmer winters

Velella velella, also called “by-the-wind sailor” jellies, that washed ashore at Moolack Beach, Oregon
Velella velella, also called “by-the-wind sailor” jellies, that washed ashore at Moolack Beach, Oregon, in 2018. COASST

As their name suggests, by-the-wind sailor jellyfish know how to catch a breeze. Using a stiff, translucent sail propped an inch above the surface of the ocean, these teacup-sized organisms skim along the water dangling a fringe of delicate purple tentacles just below the surface to capture zooplankton and larval fish as they travel.

At the mercy of the wind, these jellies can wash ashore and strand — sometimes numbering in the trillions — on beaches around the world, including up and down the U.S. West Coast. And while these mass stranding events are hard to miss, very little actually is known about how or why they happen.

Now, thanks to 20 years of observations from thousands of citizen scientists, University of Washington researchers have discovered distinct patterns in the mass strandings of by-the-wind sailors, also called Velella velella. Specifically, large strandings happened simultaneously from the northwest tip of Washington south to the Mendocino coast in California, and in years when winters were warmer than usual. The results were published March 18 in the journal Marine Ecology Progress Series.

A by-the-wind sailor that washed ashore at Moolack Beach, Oregon, in 2018. A citizen-science volunteer measured the organism for this photograph.
A by-the-wind sailor that washed ashore at Moolack Beach, Oregon, in 2018. A citizen-science volunteer measured the organism for this photograph. COASST

“Citizen scientists have collected the largest and longest dataset on mass strandings of this jelly in the world,” said senior author Julia Parrish, a professor in the UW School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences and executive director of the Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team, known as COASST.

“This paper contributes to fundamental scientific knowledge of this organism in a way that traditional ‘mainstream’ marine science has been unable to do. Thousands of trained, dedicated observers are better than any satellite because they know their beach and can alert us if something is weird or unusual.”

COASST’s citizen scientists are trained to search for and identify carcasses of marine birds that have washed ashore at sites from northern California to the Arctic Circle. Participants are asked to record and submit photos of anything strange or different they see on their stretch of beach.

In 2019, program managers received an email from COASSTers in Oregon who had expected to see Velella on their beach based on past observations, but hadn’t. That prompted COASST scientists to comb the database — 23,265 surveys in total — to see if others had taken note of these jellies over the years. This “data-mining” returned 465 reports of Velella littering 293 beaches, often in more than one year.

“On the water, Velella are beautiful, fragile creatures. When they wash ashore, these jellies quickly dry to the consistency of potato chips. During a mass stranding it’s like walking on a crunchy carpet,” Parrish said. “So of course, COASSTers reported in. Suddenly, we realized we had the largest dataset about Velella velella anywhere in the world.”

A mass stranding of by-the-wind sailor jellies at South Jetty Beach, California.
A mass stranding of by-the-wind sailor jellies at South Jetty Beach, California, in 2014. When they wash ashore, these jellies quickly dry to the consistency of potato chips and their brilliant colors fade to white. COASST

In analyzing the citizen science observations, UW researchers discovered that most by-the-wind sailors wash ashore on West Coast beaches during the spring, when the winds shift and push the organisms to shore. However, their analysis also revealed truly massive stranding events in 2003-2005 and again in 2015-2019. During the later years, jelly carcasses covered more than 620 miles (1,000 kilometers) of continuous coastline, all within a single two-week window between mid-March to mid-April.

The second period corresponds with the timing of the long-lasting marine heat wave known as “the blob” — also to blame for the largest seabird die-off of common murres, as well as mass die-offs of Cassin’s auklets, sea lions and baleen whales.

The researchers hypothesized that warmer winters during these years allowed for populations of by-the-wind sailors to spike in the open ocean. Then, when the winds shifted in the spring, massive numbers of the jellies were swept to shore and stranded.

Put another way — and though many ultimately end up dying on beaches — the jellies appear to be “winners” during warmer periods, because they can amass more numbers in the ocean. There’s some evidence that warmer-than-average winters are also calmer and less wavy in the open ocean, allowing increasingly large Velella aggregations to persist, Parrish explained.

 

“This paper and our data really do suggest that in a warming world, we’re going to have more of these organisms — that is, the ecosystem itself is tipping in the direction of these jellies because they win in warmer conditions,” Parrish said. “A changing climate creates new winners and losers in every ecosystem. What’s scary is that we’re actually documenting that change.”

As warmer winters are expected to increase with climate change, these findings could have clear implications for this jelly population, as well as for the fish they eat and the beaches where they strand and die.

The paper’s lead author is Timothy Jones, a UW postdoctoral researcher in aquatic and fishery sciences. Hillary Burgess, now with the NOAA Office of Marine Debris, is a co-author.

This research was funded by Washington Sea Grant and National Science Foundation.

For more information, contact Parrish at jparrish@uw.edu.


Sustainability of DEI Efforts at SAFS

I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do.” 

—Edward Everett Hale

In the midst of a pandemic, civil unrest after a democratic election, and their interconnections to our work, education, and relationships at SAFS, many in the SAFS community are pondering our roles in advancing diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ). These are immensely challenging tasks, which for some may invoke a state of paralysis or exhaustion, and for others a call to action. The SAFS Equity & Inclusion (EI) Committee, which has recently been raised to the status of an official school committee, strives to play a part in making SAFS a welcoming place, where people work together as a diverse and inclusive community.

Several efforts related to DEIJ are in progress at SAFS. For example, the EI Committee has hosted and sponsored several events: an Annual Open Meeting; a virtual screening of the documentary Picture a Scientist, with a follow-up discussion on gender discrimination; and two workshops led by Naheed Gina Aaftaab, assistant director, UW Center for Communication, Difference, and Equity.

A group of brochures on DEI.

In the workshop, “Dominance and difference in knowledge systems,” participants read and discussed Knowledge, Power and Decolonization: Implication for Non-Indigenous Scholars, Researchers, and Educators by Soenke Biermann. In another workshop, “Practicing anti-racism and anti-sexism in education,” participants were asked to reflect on access to certain spaces, such as higher education, and share their own experiences; they also learned practical tools for interrupting micro-aggressions and disrupting discrimination in an academic setting.

A group of adults and children look at an exhibit at the Aquatic Sciences Open House.Working toward equity and inclusion is a group/community effort, and members across SAFS peer groups have contributed. We have many graduate students and colleagues to thank for proposing a line-up of speakers for the 2021 Bevan Seminar Series on “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,” which can be viewed through recordings on the SAFS YouTube channel.

Staci Amburgey (postdoctoral scholar) led the seminar course, “Cultivating Inclusive Conservation Practices,” which can also be viewed through recordings on the SAFS YouTube channel.

The School’s DEI Book Club, facilitated by Julieta Martinelli (postdoctoral scholar), recently read and discussed Ibram X. Kendi’s How to Be an Antiracist. The next book discussion will be co-facilitated by Julieta, Kelly Mistry (graduate student), and Jennifer Gosselin and will focus on Caprice Hollins & Ilsa Govan’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion: Strategies for Facilitating Conversations on Race.

The SAFS outreach program, Students Explore Aquatic Sciences (SEAS), aims to increase access to science for underserved students in the Seattle area; it is volunteer run by graduate students, undergraduates, and staff.

Many SAFS members devote time and effort to DEIJ, and there is now a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice and Community Service Recognition Award to help highlight, celebrate, and reward these significant contributions.

A child interacts with an exhibit at the Aquatic Sciences Open House.

There is still much work to be done to increase DEIJ at SAFS. Based on community engagements and co-created objectives, the School is moving forward with a racial equity audit to provide baseline data, give opportunities to the SAFS community to voice their perspectives, and produce guidelines for working toward racial equity in a way that is meaningful and effective. This will be an important step towards promoting many dimensions of social justice in the School. It will be a great opportunity for increased participation and will be a critical juncture for maintained engagement from many at our School’s members. Following the departure of Isadora Jimenez- Hidalgo (see DEI article in the Spring-Summer 2020 SAFS newsletter), SAFS is in the process of hiring a new diversity specialist, who will help support DEIJ efforts at the School.

The EI Committee is excited to work with the entire SAFS community (past and present) to make SAFS a place where diversity is celebrated within a vibrant hub of discovery and innovation. Please feel free to reach out to the EI Committee at safsincl@uw.edu, visit the SAFS DEI website, and stay tuned for further announcements of upcoming events.


SAFS Autumn 20 / Winter 21 Newsletter – Director’s Message

André PuntDear Friends,

As I look out of my office window, I see the first snow of 2021—a reminder to me that even with everything that is going on, there is still some normality.

Enhancing SAFS through increased diversity is an ongoing priority—the importance of which has been underscored by events this past year. In this issue, learn about some of our efforts and activities to advance diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice in SAFS. I also encourage you to view the seminars from this year’s Bevan Series, which are focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion. These are uploaded to our YouTube channel.

Sadly, in late 2020, we lost two of our emeritus faculty: Bruce Miller and Glenn VanBlaricom. Bruce passed away at the end of October 2020. A brief summary of his career, along with thoughts from his friends, colleagues, and past students about his role as a mentor and marine biologist extraordinaire can be found here. Glenn passed away on Christmas Eve 2020. We will include a memoriam for Glenn in our next issue of the newsletter and invite thoughts and comments from his former students and other friends to include in our tribute.

In this issue we feature three of our long-term staff members who have recently been awarded principle investigator status. Rebecca Buchanan and Jennifer Gosselin, research scientists with Columbia Basin Research, are stepping into the role of leaders of a research group that provides managers and decision makers with the key scientific information needed for the conservation of salmonids throughout the West Coast. We also profile Jason Toft, who took over the leadership of the Wetland Ecosystem Team (WET) after the retirements of Charles “Si” Simenstad and Jeff Cordell (see page 8 to learn more about Jeff and his 40+ years at the UW). Jason and his team conduct research to support conservation and restoration efforts, with a focus on our very own backyard here in Seattle.

Many of you have asked how SAFS is handling the pandemic. Building coordinator Jon Wittouck has worked to ensure that we are able to run some labs, and some of our fieldwork has also taken place; but, like most of you, our lives are a long sequence of Zoom meetings, punctuated by watching cats and other pets invading screens.

I would like to thank all of our supporters for their contributions during the last year. Your gifts give the School the ability to support students who would otherwise not be able to attend the University of Washington as well as research projects that are advancing knowledge but are not yet sufficiently well developed to be supported through traditional funding routes. We profile one of our long-term donors, Chuck McCallum (CEO of the Chignik Regional Aquacultural Association) on page 9.

Finally, I would like to highlight a new fund that will support the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice and Community Service Recognition Award, a way to recognize those individuals who are going above and beyond to make SAFS more welcoming and successful.

Keep well and keep safe.

André Punt


New Principal Investigators, But Not New to SAFS

Three SAFS researchers have become principal investigators on two of the School’s long-term projects. Although new to their positions, they are not new to SAFS. Rebecca Buchanan and Jennifer Gosselin are the recently appointed PIs at Columbia Basin Research (CBR). Both came to CBR after earning doctoral degrees (Rebecca 2005; Jennifer 2015) and completing postdoctoral research. Jason Toft works on the Wetland Ecosystem Team (WET), where he has been a research scientist since obtaining his MS degree at SAFS in 2000.

REBECCA BUCHANAN

After Rebecca earned an AB in Mathematics, she explored teaching secondary school math, but it was not a good fit. However, it was her first real experience with probability and statistics, which she really enjoyed. Since childhood, she had been interested in both ecology and the environment, so Quantitative Ecology & Resource Management (QERM) was a natural fit‚ a unique program that combined her two primary interests. “I found the work fascinating (and fun!) and the people friendly and supportive,” she said.

At Columbia Basin Research (CBR), Rebecca helped develop analytical tools for interpreting tag data from large salmon and steelhead studies in the Columbia and Snake river basins. She also helped develop a branching model to estimate cohort survival of juvenile fish moving out of estuaries into the mainstem river. These programs were inspired by real needs of fisheries and hydropower managers and were collaborative efforts with others at CBR—including founding PI John Skalski, programmer Jim Lady, and analyst Rich Townsend.

In recent years, Rebecca has focused on monitoring survival of juvenile salmon and steelhead through the Joaquin River Delta in California. She said that efforts to improve survival by modifying water project operations have had surprisingly little benefit for salmon coming from the San Joaquin River, although there is considerably more potential for steelhead.

Rebecca found that installation of a temporary rock barrier to block off one of two major migration routes can help steelhead get through the system—it appears that the benefit of the barrier is the diversion of water into an accessible route. Surprisingly, the barrier does not appear to help the salmon, perhaps because their survival is much lower overall.

As a new PI, Rebecca looks forward to working with students in SAFS and QERM. She and Jennifer Gosselin are also talking about how they can engage the wider public—school students and interested citizens—in learning more about salmon in their local communities. She said, “This type of outreach helps inspire future scientists and decision-makers, who we will need if we are to maintain and restore native fish populations while meeting clean energy goals to combat climate change and support our economy.”

Outside of work, Rebecca has been singing in the Seattle Choral Company (SCC) since 2001. She said, “The SCC has provided both a musical home and a warm community that I treasure.”


JENNIFER GOSSELIN

Jennifer came to SAFS for her PhD to study with Jim Anderson, working on a salmon project in the Snake and Columbia rivers. She said, “My eyes opened up to interactions across different habitats of the salmon life cycle and what part humans play in various stages.”

As a research scientist at CBR, Jennifer has been examining freshwater, marine, climate, biological, and anthropogenic indices with direct effects within life stages and carryover effects across life stages. She is also investigating which relationships may have worked well historically, which correlations are breaking down over time, and how one could interpret these changes in ecological research and decision-making contexts.

Jennifer noted that, “At CBR (founded by Skalski and Anderson), we make real-time data and models accessible to scientists, decision makers, managers, and the public through our website (www.cbr. washington.edu).” She now thinks deeply about access to information: who CBR aims to serve and how to do so in a respectful manner to strengthen relationships.

In her new role as PI, Jennifer co-directs CBR with Rebecca Buchanan. She is learning about how CBR has existed and adapted in the last three decades, and is thinking more broadly, given our current challenging times of the pandemic, inequities, and climate change.

Currently, Jennifer is co-chair of the SAFS Equity & Inclusion (EI) Committee. She said, “As each member [of SAFS] feels safer to give their best and their all, our School will be more fulfilled, vibrant, and richer in its scientific/educational contributions and community service. Imagine a space in which it is not only safe to ’fail forward,’ but where we are encouraged to do so. We learn from our mistakes and innovate more quickly.” She notes that it is important to maintain our efforts (see recent EI article).

Jennifer is fluent in English, French, and Vietnamese. Recently, through United Nations Online Volunteering, she translated a proposal about natural resource management in Burkina Faso from French to English, helping the authors reach a wider audience for potential funding. She hopes to continue connecting with people and cultures in which these languages are immersed.


JASON TOFT

Jason Toft has been a research scientist on the Wetland Ecosystem Team (WET) since he earned an MS at SAFS in 2000. His research is focused along urban shorelines and the interactions of people and nature. One change Jason noted since he first came to WET is that, ”Many funders and collaborators are more concerned with topics of ‘applied science’ than when I started out.” 

Over the years, Jason has become increasingly involved with funding and leading research activities. He said his new role as PI brings more responsibility for leading the lab and securing grants and “the freedom to pursue research interests, whatever they may be, and broaden WET’s collaborations with other groups.” 

Charles “Si” Simenstad and Jeff Cordell were Jason’s main mentors over the years, doubling as his colleagues and friends. Jason is interested in continuing to mentor undergraduates in their capstone research, serve on graduate committees, give guest lectures, and offer research opportunities for students within WET laboratory and fieldwork activities. 

Jason said shoreline restoration actions at the Olympic Sculpture Park were instrumental for WET to use as a case study to inform more recent eco-engineering shoreline restoration along Seattle’s downtown seawall. He finds it interesting to measure how different restoration actions work, and this can and is being used to inform future efforts worldwide. 

Jason strives to involve volunteers from the community during fieldwork data collection. He said, “This addition of citizen scientists, in partnership with our UW students and staff, brings a perspective that is important in championing our work and building a network of concerned citizens, as well as academics and agency partners.” Jason added that WET researchers increased their collaborations with citizen scientist groups, especially as related to shoreline restoration in Puget Sound, by making monitoring protocols and data more available to non-academic scientists (shoremonitoring.org). 

When asked what he does in his free time, Jason replied that he has played drums his whole life and that, “Even though my kids bang on them as much as I do nowadays, music will always be a part of me.” 


In Memoriam: Bruce Stuart Miller

SAFS thanks the Miller family and the many faculty, students, and staff for their contributions to this memoriam. Some content was adapted from the obituary written by Craig and Catherine Miller and published in The Seattle Times on November 8, 2020.

On 31 October 2020, Bruce Stuart Miller, SAFS professor emeritus, passed away at the age of 84.

Portrait photo of MillerBorn in Worcester, Massachusetts, Bruce was raised in Iowa City, Iowa, with his three brothers. He studied chemistry and biology at Grinnell College and did his graduate research at UW Fisheries (MS 1965, PhD 1969), where he studied the life history of flathead sole off Orcas Island, Washington.

Bruce was a cherished member of the SAFS faculty for 45 years. He was a professor for 27 years, retiring in 2002; he continued his passion for his field of study for 18 more years as professor emeritus. He was widely known and highly regarded for his expertise on the biology, ecology, and life history of marine fishes. Many of his students have gone on to successful careers in aquatic and fishery sciences.

Bruce’s contributions to marine biology are exten-sive. His 2009 textbook, Early Life History of Marine Fishes (Arthur Kendall, Jr., co-author), continues to influence and inspire marine scientists. He published two of the School’s Fisheries Research Institute’s (FRI) most requested technical publications: a 1980 atlas on the geographical distribution of Puget Sound fishes (Steven Borton, co-author), and a 1987 characterization of a Puget Sound marine fishes data survey (Lawrence Moulton, co-author).

Bruce served as FRI interim director from 1984 to 1986, after FRI Director Robert L. Burgner retired. In 1987, he became director of FRI’s Division of Fishery Science and Management. Bruce also spent much time—as a student and as a professor—at UW’s Friday Harbor Labs (FHL) on San Juan Island conducting research, teaching marine fish biology and ecology courses, and mentoring undergraduates in FHL’s research apprenticeship program. The San Juan Islands were his favorite place to work and a fantastic location to raise his family and go scuba diving.

Two people in diving gear and another person stand on docks by the water.
Bruce and Marie Miller, Orcas Island, 1964. Ray Buckley

Close friend, colleague, and collaborator Don Gunderson (SAFS professor emeritus; PhD 1976) elaborated on Bruce’s work: “He was interested in early life-history stages, which led to the book he wrote with Art Kendall.” Bruce strongly influenced Don: “I had mainly studied oceanic [fishes], but he lured me to FHL and the Salish Sea, which became my major research focus.” When Don told former FRI faculty Steve Mathews (PhD 1977) about Bruce’s passing, Steve put it succinctly: “A straight shooter always.”

Kerim Aydin (PhD 2000 and former SAFS postdoc supervised by Bruce) oversees the Alaska Fisheries Science Center’s (AFSC) Resource Ecology and Ecosystem Modeling Program. He said “Bruce worked with AFSC’s decades-long groundfish food habits program. His work and support have left a legacy of one of the largest collections of groundfish food habits data in the world, consisting of over 350,000 predators sampled.” Kerim noted that Bruce was involved as recently as September 2020: “He helped review the lab’s COVID reintegration procedures to ensure staff safety.” Bruce also supported SAFS students through AFSC projects, including groundfish reproductive biology and fish food habits studies.

Bruce was graduate committee chair and a very special mentor, colleague, and friend to two generations of the Buckley family—Ray (PhD 1997); his wife, Marta Gomez-Buckley (MS 2000); and his son, Troy (MS 1995).

Ray, SAFS affiliate faculty member with 45 years at the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), remembers Bruce as first and foremost a professor for the students. Ray said: “Bruce supported us throughout our graduate careers. His expertise on marine fishes was unique at SAFS.” Ray added, “He always greeted you with a warm smile and gave freely of his knowledge.”

Marta remembers Bruce as a gentle giant “in stature and expertise.” She said, “He was someone you could trust. He listened and guided you through challenging graduate life with respect.”

Troy, recently retired from NOAA Fisheries, and his wife, Kristin, held a memorial for Bruce off the San Juan Islands: “It was a beautiful day to reflect on the quiet guidance from Bruce that I so appreciated as an undergraduate, a graduate student, and a colleague.”

Bob Lauth (MS 1987) credits Bruce with teaching him skills he applied across much of the eastern Pacific. He summed up: “Bruce’s memory lives on in my mind in all those places.”

Wayne Palsson (MS 1984) said, “He opened up doors for me, especially for marine fish research in Puget Sound and Alaska. Like many of Bruce’s students, I worked on marine fish ecology and groundfish biology throughout my career.” Wayne also worked with several of Bruce’s students, including Ray Buckley and Bob Pacunski (MS 1990) at WDFW. He summed up: “I thank Bruce for the many foundational lessons he taught me, which I apply every day.”

Bruce at Friday Harbor, 1977. David Greenfield
Bruce at Friday Harbor, 1977. David Greenfield

Bruce served on Susanne McDermott’s graduate committees (MS 1994, PhD 2003). She observed that he “understood how fish reproductive ecology and early life history shapes the behavior, distribution, and population dynamics of fish.” Susanne, an AFSC employee, added, “He was meticulous and expected the same from his students and colleagues. His down-to-earth approach and sense of humor made him a great person to work with.”

Bruce met his wife, Aase Marie, while they were working at UW Fisheries in the early 1960s. They were married for 55 years, and for both of them, family was the center of their world.

Bruce is preceded in death by his wife and survived by his brother, Bill; his two children, Catherine and Craig; and three grandchildren, Soren, Andreas, and Sarah. Donations in Bruce’s name can be made to the Friday Harbor Labs Discretionary Fund.


“Bruce loved marine fishes. His teaching and research philosophy was organic and always had a foundation in field work, whether it was in, on, or near the water. Among his favorite research tools were plankton nets, scuba diving, beach seines, and otter trawls.”

—Bob Lauth (MS 1987)

 

“Bruce was a great advisor and mentor to me, and just an all-around wonderful person.”

—Bob Pacunski (MS 1990)

 

“I was Dr. Miller’s graduate student from 1983 to 1987. He was a great advisor to me. With great patience, he improved my writing for technical reports. I remember he was always a humble gentleman. He will be missed.” 

—Mei-Sun Yang (MS, 1987)

 


Donor Profile: Chuck McCallum, Chignik Regional Aquacultural Association

The Chignik Regional Aquaculture Association (CRAA) has been involved with the Fisheries Research Institute (FRI) for 40+ years. (FRI’s title changed to Alaska Salmon Program (ASP) in the late 1990s, but the old name is still commonly used in Alaska.) The funding CRAA provides helps FRI maintain important fisheries research in Chignik as well as educate future fisheries scientists.

Chuck McCallum, Chief Executive Officer of CRAA

The CRAA has gained tremendous knowledge from the ecological work that FRI and ASP researchers have conducted on two sockeye salmon runs that annually return to the Chignik River drainage on the South Alaska Peninsula. These runs are the life-blood of a major local salmon fishery. Further, they are culturally and economically essential to five coastal Chignik Native villages.

Chuck McCallum, the Chief Executive Officer of CRAA since its inception, has helped oversee the organization’s gifts to SAFS. Since that time, CRAA has been giving to the UW through the Chignik River Fund, which focuses on research in the Chignik River System.

When asked what prompted CRAA’s first gift to SAFS, Chuck replied, “At CRAA’s founding in 1990, we were aware of FRI’s history of high-quality fisheries work in the Chignik area. The local villagers told us that FRI scientists worked well with them and had their confidence.” He added, “At the time, the most helpful and influential FRI scientists at Chignik were Don Rogers (former professor) and Greg Ruggerone (PhD 1989).”

Through FRI’s field work and ensuing publications, CRAA has gained a better understanding of how Chignik’s two salmon runs interact and how the salmon are adjusting to several major natural watershed changes since the 1960s, and of course, to climate change. This information will aid in evaluating whether the Alaska Corps of Engineers, in cooperation with local villages and stakeholders, should go forward with restoration projects aimed at preventing further impact to the health and viability of these sockeye runs.

“The money CRAA has gifted to FRI has always been used wisely and efficiently to safeguard Chignik sockeye salmon habitat and to advance production and management efficiency. This aligns well with CRAA’s purpose, goals, and objectives. When we have non-allocative fisheries issues and questions, including future run strengths, watershed status, and sockeye rearing conditions, FRI staff is always there for us.”

—Chuck McCallum, Chief Executive Officer, CRAA

In addition to habitat evaluation studies in the Chignik River drainage, FRI has been assisting fishery Donor Profilemanagers at the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. FRI has been providing cutting-edge real-time tools to help ensure that Chignik’s sockeye runs meet escapement targets, and surpluses are available to the commercial and subsistence fishers in season.

Chuck said that, “without reservation, FRI has always done first-class fishery science in Chignik. It is highly respected by the members of CRAA and the local Chignik villages.” He continued, “FRI is non-political and has always been direct and honest in addressing issues involving the Chignik sockeye salmon.”

Sockeye salmon heading upstream to spawn. Dennis Wise/University of Washington

Chuck commented, “All of our experiences with FRI have been worthwhile and professional.” He described Daniel Schindler (SAFS professor) as a “no-nonsense world-class salmon scientist.” Chuck said that Daniel shares his knowledge—not only with CRAA staff, but also with the fishing community. In season, Daniel comes across as tireless, and he is there for CRAA practically 24-7. He said, “Daniel has an innate ability to present complicated information and analyses in a manner that most everyone can grasp rather easily,” which Chuck said is important, especially at public meetings, including those with the Alaska Board of Fisheries.


Julia Indivero awarded ESA 2021 Graduate Student Policy Award

Julia L. Indivero headshot
Julia Indivero

The Ecological Society of America (ESA) is honored to announce the Katherine S. McCarter Graduate Student Policy Award (GSPA) 2021 cohort. This award provides graduate students with the opportunity to receive policy and communication training before they meet lawmakers.

ESA selected 23 students to receive the award including Julia L. Indivero from the University of Washington School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences.

Students will meet virtually in April to learn about the federal legislative process and science funding, to hear from ecologists working in federal agencies, and to meet with their Members of Congress on Capitol Hill. This Congressional Visit Day, organized and sponsored by ESA, offers GSPA recipients the chance to interact with policymakers and discuss the importance of federal funding for science and the need for research relief for the biological and ecological sciences.

“Early careers scientists who are passionate about understanding and contributing to the world of policy are needed now more than ever,” said ESA President Kathleen Weathers “ESA is delighted to offer this opportunity for graduate students to engage with policy and policy makers.”

Click here to see a Flickr album with photos of this year’s award winners.

Julia Indivero standing by a lake in the mountains
Julia Indivero in the field

Julia Indivero is a first-year M.S. student in the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences at the University of Washington under the supervision of Dr. Tim Essington. Her research focuses on modeling fish community dynamics to advance the sustainable management of fisheries. She received her B.A. in Biology and Environmental Studies from Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut in 2017. She has previously researched ecology and conservation biology with the Organization for Tropical Studies in South Africa and Oregon Sea Grant at the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve. She most recently worked with the Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory at the Marine and Coastal Research Laboratory in Sequim, Washington. She is also dedicated to STEM outreach and education and serves as a mentor with the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship Program.

This story was adapted from a release originally published by the Ecological Society of America.


DNA sequencing reveals genetic basis of herring biodiversity

Conducting herring field work in Bella Bella, British Columbia in 2014. Richard Reid (Heiltsuk Coastal Guardian Watchmen), Eleni Petrou (UW) and Kira Krumhansl (SFU) subsample herring for genetic research.
Conducting herring field work in Bella Bella, British Columbia in 2014. Richard Reid (Heiltsuk Coastal Guardian Watchmen), Eleni Petrou (UW) and Kira Krumhansl (SFU) subsample herring for genetic research. Mark Wunsch

Herring that spawn at different times of the year are genetically distinct from one another, according to a new paper published Feb 24th in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

The study, led by Eleni Petrou and Lorenz Hauser from the University of Washington School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, shows that populations of Pacific herring along the US west coast are genetically structured based on when they spawn and secondarily, where they spawn. These findings run counter to the common commercial fishing practices where herring are targeted and managed by area.

“Our findings show that Pacific herring populations may be at higher risk of unintentional overexploitation by fisheries,” said Petrou. “Most herring fisheries are spatially managed and do not account for genetically and demographically distinct populations occupying the same areas.”

Taking herring measurements in the field. Grant Callegari (Hakai Institute).
Taking herring measurements in the field. Grant Callegari (Hakai Institute)

Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) are an extremely valuable commercial fishery as well as a cultural keystone species for coastal Indigenous communities. Large scale sac roe commercial fisheries for herring in British Columbia and Alaska often target the fish solely for their prized roe or eggs, which are sold to global markets. Traditional subsistence fishing practices by Coast Salish peoples and Alaska Natives take a more sustainable approach by first allowing the herring to return and spawn before harvesting the eggs from hemlock branches, kelp, and hair seaweed.

This research was done in collaboration with  Native American Tribes, Alaska Natives, and First Nations who, for generations, have been stewards of these herring fisheries that are an integral part of their cultural identity.

The research team partnered with the Suquamish and Puyallup Tribes in Washington, the Haida Nation and Heiltsuk Nation in BC, and the Sitka Tribe of Alaska, and management agencies (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, NOAA) to design the sampling scheme and aid in collecting herring samples across the study’s large geographic area, from Washington state north to southwest Alaska. The added citizen science component was immensely beneficial in terms of gathering the samples needed to run the study and providing important historical context through Indigenous traditional ecological knowledge.

Mike Miller (Sitka Tribe of Alaska) collects an important traditional food- herring eggs on hemlock branches. Madonna Moss
Mike Miller (Sitka Tribe of Alaska) collects an important traditional food- herring eggs on hemlock branches. Madonna Moss

“Big declines in herring have been reported after heavy commercial fishing that was localized in a particular bay.” said Petrou. “Elders would tell us that there used to be fish in an area for as long as they could remember and then a large fleet came into the bay and took out 20,000 tons in one season, and they haven’t seen any spawning activity since.”

To supplement the modern herring samples and accounts, the team also analyzed ancient herring bones found at archeological sites in the traditional territories of the Suquamish Tribe and the Puyallup Tribe. These bone fragments were housed in a collection at the Burke Museum and donated for the study.

“We extracted the DNA from the ancient herring bones, and then we compared it to the modern samples to get a sense of which herring populations Coast Salish peoples depended on in the past,” said Petrou.

Herring vertebrae from the Burton Acres Archaeological Collection (45KI437) on Vashon Island. This collection is held in trust by the Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture and is the property of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians. Eleni Petrou.
Herring vertebrae from the Burton Acres Archaeological Collection (45KI437) on Vashon Island. This collection is held in trust by the Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture and is the property of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians. Eleni Petrou

The results of the analysis show reproductive timing drives the population structure for Pacific herring. Further, these findings can be used to illuminate the life history of herring, both in the distant past and in more contemporary case studies.

The Cherry Point herring population of the northern Puget Sound was once the largest population in the area, supporting a small sac roe fishery before its collapse.

“In the 1970s, that population actually made up more than half of the total biomass in Puget Sound, and now it’s pretty much gone,” said Hauser, professor of aquatic and fisheries sciences and one of the paper’s co-authors. “What Petrou showed in her research is that the population is genetically very distinct from all the other populations, and now it has virtually disappeared.”

The Cherry Point population was petitioned to be listed on the Endangered Species Act twice, in 2000 and 2010, but NOAA believed that the differentiation between early and late spawners was not enough for them to be recognized as a distinct population segment. Currently, the population has yet to recover even though there is no longer any fishing pressure.

Incorporating new research toward the understanding of herring population dynamics can help influence management decisions by guiding sustainable practices and avoiding resource exploitation in a rapidly changing marine environment.

“Identifying the genetic basis of variation in reproductive timing in forage fish such as Pacific herring is important for predicting impacts of climate change, fishing, and other human activities on marine food webs,” Petrou said. Given the ecological, economic, and cultural significance of herring, our results demonstrate the importance of intraspecific genetic diversity on ecosystem processes now and in the future.”

UW co-authors include Petrou, Hauser, Carolyn Tarpey and Isadora Jiménez-Hidalgo. A full list of co-authors is available in the paper.

This research was funded by Washington Sea Grant, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Strategic Partnership Grant, and a US National Science Foundation award.

For more information, contact Petrou at elpetrou@uw.edu or Hauser at lhauser@uw.edu.


Logging change in Puget Sound: Researchers use UW vessel logbooks to reconstruct historical groundfish populations

Archive image of the R/V Commando as it passes through the Montlake Cut
The R/V Commando passes through the Montlake Cut. Skipper Tom Oswold Jr. is on the flying bridge and engineer Olaf Rockness is on the bow. Handwritten logbook entries from this UW research vessel, which operated between 1955 and 1980, were invaluable to present-day research on the population trends of groundfish species in Puget Sound. Bob Hirtz

To understand how Puget Sound has changed, we first must understand how it used to be. Unlike most major estuaries in the U.S. — and despite the abundance of world-class oceanographic institutions in the area — long-term monitoring of Puget Sound fish populations did not exist until 1990. Filling in this missing information is essential to establishing a baseline that would provide context for the current status of the marine ecosystem, and could guide policymakers in setting more realistic ecosystem-based management recovery targets.

Researchers from the University of Washington School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, UW Puget Sound Institute, NOAA’s Northwest Fisheries Science Center and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife have discovered an unconventional way to help fill in these gaps in data: using old vessel logbooks.

The crews of the University of Washington’s then School of Fisheries’ research vessels R/V Oncorhynchus (1947 to 1955) and R/V Commando (1955 to 1980), both of which were skippered by Tom Oswold, took notes on all of the fish tows conducted under their watch. With funding from Washington Sea Grant, the researchers combed through more than 1,000 of these logbook entries to analyze the information regarding the groundfish species caught in each tow, including when and where the fish were caught. Then, the researchers analyzed historical logbook data from 1948 to 1977 and contemporary monitoring data to reveal longer-term trends in the local groundfish populations. The research was published in Marine Ecology Progress Series last month.

Although there were changes throughout the periods analyzed, the researchers did not find that groundfish populations today in Puget Sound look fundamentally different from the historical populations.

“We see the same types of fluctuations in the historical data as in the contemporary data,” said Tim Essington, professor at the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences and the study’s lead author. “This suggests that boom and bust populations are natural, and speaks to the importance of having a long time view to establishing a baseline.”

However, some trends did stand out, Essington explained. For example, Pacific cod used to be very common but is rare today, and the abundance of Pacific spiny dogfish has decreased.

The fact that the researchers were able to fill in any of the historical gaps was really a matter of luck: the right people had maintained the research vessels at the right time.

“They were remarkable, the records,” Essington said. “They not only noted the species and size, but also detailed descriptions of the locations. It was amazing what we could reconstruct.”

A page from one of the logbooks on the R/V Commando
A page from one of the logbooks on the R/V Commando. Bob Hirtz

Bob Hirtz was a graduate student at the School of Fisheries from 1957 to 1960, during which he ventured out on the Commando along with Oswold and his advisor, Allan DeLacy, to collect data for his research on Puget Sound rockfish. He remembers once being chastised for filling out the logbook incorrectly.

“I had misspelled one of the scientific names — that was the only time I remember that DeLacy got mad at me,” Hirtz said. “He said that the logbooks had to be correct.”

This level of precision made Essington’s work possible decades later. For Hirtz, the logbooks also became a rich repository of memories.

“When I was going through the logs of the Commando, I found an entry that I had written on May 3, 1960,” he wrote in a 2015 blog post. “It was for trip #6017 and it brought back a wave of memories, since that was my first encounter with the open waters of the Pacific Ocean. At the time I was being considered for a job with the Exploratory group which worked the outside waters from Mexico to the Bering Sea. The first thing that came to my mind was, would I become seasick once I was outside? If so, would three years of graduate school be wasted? There was no class about seasickness given at the [School of Fisheries], but there was talk.”

Although the researchers analyzed logbooks up until 1977, Essington explained that they became considerably less useful after 1973. As Hirtz recalls, this was around the time the school began to place more emphasis on chartering the Commando for outside research, rather than using it for students’ education and research.

“I assume the logbooks became less important when the boat was being chartered,” Hirtz said.

Essington described the project methods as “half detective work and half computer work.” The detective work involved the researchers carefully perusing the old logbooks while wearing N-95 masks to protect themselves from the mildew and dust (prior to COVID-19). The computer work involved analyzing how the catch rates of 15 groundfish species differed between the historical and contemporary datasets, to understand how the general groundfish populations differed between the two periods.

Given that the details within the logbooks petered out, and then stopped altogether once the Commando was retired, the researchers were forced to leave out an important period in their analysis.

“There was a 17-year gap between the captain’s books and current monitoring, and no amount of scrappiness could fill this in,” Essington said.

The years between the two datasets — the bulk of the 1970s and 80s — also happened to coincide with extensive environmental change in Puget Sound, including the implementation of regulations to address pollution and protect endangered species. A few changes particularly impacted groundfish: For example, the 1974 Boldt decision resulted in increased non-tribal recreational groundfish fishing. Subsequently, the introduction of bag limits, marine protected areas and species-take prohibitions in the late 1980s and early 1990s reduced the intensity of recreational groundfish fishing.

In June 2020, groundfish were added as a food web indicator species for the Puget Sound Partnership’s Puget Sound Vital Signs, which has guided policy since 2010. This research could help shed light on what to look for as healthy for this vital sign, the authors said.

“It might be better to think about baselines in the dynamic sense,” Essington said. “To focus on acceptable ranges of fluctuation, rather than a precise number.”

Other co-authors are Eric Ward and Correigh Greene of the Northwest Fisheries Sciences Center; Tessa Francis of Puget Sound Institute at UW Tacoma; Lauren Kuehne, an independent consultant who previously worked at the UW School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences; and Dayv Lowry of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

This study was funded by Washington Sea Grant, The Seadoc Society and the Lowell Wakefield Endowment.

For more information, contact Essington at essing@uw.edu.


Usha Varanasi featured in Food for Thought: Luminaries Collection

Affiliate faculty Usha Varanasi recently published an article as part of the ICES Journal of Marine Science (ICES JMS) Food for Thought: Luminaries Collection, a curated collection of articles written by distinguished luminaries in the field of Marine Science.

In the article, “Casting a wide net and making the most of the catch”, she describes the “lessons learned and the people and principles that influenced six decades of professional endeavours from graduate schools to ascending, often unexpectedly, the science and management ladder in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) fisheries.” She goes on to detail her research in cetacean biosonar, the impacts of fossil fuel pollution on seafood and marine health, and her transition to management as director of the Northwest Fisheries Science Center.

Read the full article