An explanation for suddenly elevated numbers of small “sneaker” males in Kodiak Island sockeye salmon

Male Pacific salmon usually compete aggressively with each other to gain access to spawning females, and are most successful when they are old and large. But a few males come back from the ocean early and small, and with less noticeable male traits. These small males are called “jacks” and cannot win battles of aggression but instead compete by sneaking into the spawning arena and fertilizing eggs on the sly. Ordinarily, jacks are a tiny proportion of the total population, but in recent years have accounted for more than half of returning male sockeye salmon in Frazer Lake, Kodiak Island, Alaska. Since jacks are small, they have little commercial value, and this has led to large economic losses for local fisheries. The reasons for these elevated jack numbers were examined by looking at historical data on salmon returns to this population, finding that spawning years with high proportions of jacks tended to produce many jacks when they returned from the ocean in turn. In addition, since small jacks return after fewer years in the ocean than large aggressive males, jacks produced in high-return years can come back in years corresponding to low returns, effectively swamping the population with jacks. These “cohort mismatches”, together with fisheries selection for large salmon, can then lead to years with high proportions of jacks, which will be successful at fertilizing eggs. The new work appears in the journal Evolutionary Applications and was led by SAFS PhD student Lukas DeFilippo, SAFS professors Daniel Schindler and André Punt, SAFS research scientist Jan Ohlberger, in addition to Kevin Schaberg, Matt Foster, and Darin Ruhl of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.

Increasing numbers of jacks (small sneaking males) in sockeye salmon in Frazer Lake, Kodiak Island.

 


Crosses between transgenic fish and wild fish can inherit rapid transgenic growth

Genetic engineering is widely used in plants and animals to promote rapid growth and create resistance to common diseases. One genetic modification that has achieved prominence in fish is the insertion of growth hormone transgenes, which produce dramatically larger sizes and rapid growth rates. However, there is concern that escaped genetically modified fish might breed with their wild counterparts, passing on the genetic modification and changing the wild population. The effects of the transgene on key fitness traits, such as growth in the wild, are very difficult to predict. This is because growth is encoded by many genes that interact with each other and with the environment to produce individuals of different sizes. In a new study, a unique experimental design in Coho salmon was used to explore the effects of an inserted transgene on the genetic architecture explaining growth rates. An experimental family was created, where half of the offspring contained the genetic modification and half did not. Besides this change, these offspring shared the same wild-type genetic background. After 6 months, the offspring with the transgene were noticeably larger than those that did not contain the modified genes. The most significant result was that the insertion of the transgene disrupted the genetic architecture of growth in the transgenic offspring by interacting with a different set of genes than those expressed in the unmodified offspring. There are strong implications for the ecological risks involved, should transgenic fish escape captivity and interbreed with their wild counterparts. The insertion of the transgene can affect the way that natural selection might act on growth related traits, and may occur in different directions in wild versus transgenic fish. As a consequence, different genetic variation for growth-related genes may arise. The results show that risk assessments also have to consider the stability of genetic variation underlying growth related traits over time. The new work by former SAFS PhD student Miyako Kodama, SAFS professor Kerry Naish, and Robert Devlin of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, appears in the journal Evolutionary Applications.


Space travel requires more carbon than expected

Long-term life-support in space requires renewable sources of oxygen and food that can survive and thrive in a closed system without any external inputs. In a closed-system experiment, three species of green algae were added to a nutrient mixture together with a grazer species, the common water flea (Daphnia magna). Despite calculations of the appropriate level of carbon and nitrogen needed in the mixture, the pH in the closed system rapidly increased to become highly alkaline (pH 10-11), so much so that most forms of life would not be able to survive. Increasing the ratio of carbon to nitrogen from the previously calculated values of 26.4 to much higher ratios (105-845) did reduce pH somewhat (to 9.3-10.3) and prolong the lifetime of the cultures, but not indefinitely. These results suggest that a continued input of carbon is required for life support systems, and that more work is needed to find appropriate cultures that can allow long-term survival of algal and grazer communities. The work by SAFS Professor Emeritus Fried Taub, appears in the journal Life Sciences in Space Research.

Changes in chemistry in closed systems showing the effect of algal growth. The purple line shows the rapid increase in pH leading to poor conditions for life.

Common pathways in fisheries management

Managing fisheries usually follows one of three pathways: limiting catches, limiting fishing effort, or limiting where fishing can take place. In a new review, each of these pathways is explored to examine their biological, social and economic implications. Limiting catches includes guideline harvests, strict limits on the total catch, allocations to groups, division of the total catch among individual participants, and fully transferable individual rights to catch a portion of the total allowable catch. Strict limits on catch support sustainability, but profits are low if fishermen must compete with each other for catch. When fishing effort is limited, either by reducing boats, size of boats, amount of fishing gear, or the length of the fishing season, this leads fishers to undermine sustainability by expanding fishing on unregulated dimensions, and to profit-reducing capital stuffing where money is spent to gain a small advantage over others. Spatial access involves designating a regulated fishing area, or a closed area around which fishing is allowed on fish that “spillover” from the closed area. If a closed area produces spillover, economic and social outcomes are based on the catch and effort limitations in place where fishing is allowed. The new review published in Fish and Fisheries, was led by SAFS professor Chris Anderson, together with SAFS graduate students Melissa Krigbaum, Martin Arostegui, Megan Feddern, Jachary Koehn, Peter Kuriyama, Christina Morrisett, Caitlin Allen Akselrud, Melanie Davis, Courtney Fiamengo, Ava Fuller, Qi Lee, Katherine McElroy, Maite Pons, and Jessica Sanders.

Overlapping types of fisheries management, showing three pathways to management: restricting catch, restricting effort, and spatial restrictions.

Rise in water temperature will lead to earlier salmon hatch dates

Water temperatures affect the length of salmon incubation, including the periods between spawning and hatching, and between hatching and the emergence of free-swimming fry. In Bristol Bay, Alaska, lake temperatures are predicted to increase by 0.7-1.4°C from 2015 to 2099 at the time of the year when incubation occurs, due to the effect of human emissions of greenhouse gases. As a result, sockeye salmon in Alaska will start hatching 16 to 30 days earlier than at present, according to a new model that examined the effects of climate change on 25 populations of sockeye salmon in four Alaskan lakes. The ecological consequences of these expected changes in the timing of hatching remain unknown, as the connections to the timing of fry emergence from gravels into the water column and their subsequent interactions with the plankton are not understood. The work was led by Morgan Sparks at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, included two SAFS coauthors, Professors Thomas Quinn and Daniel Schindler, and appears in the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

Change in the number of days from peak spawning (18 August) to hatching for Woody Island beach spawning sockeye salmon in Alaska, under two different scenarios modeling greenhouse gas emissions, and three climate models.

Micro-slices of fish scales reveal effects of dams on lungfish diet

Australian lungfish are living fossils that have survived virtually unchanged since their appearance in the fossil record 340 million years ago. They are well known to have the nifty ability to survive for several days out of water. Now, a new study uses their scales to infer what they ate over periods of more than 50 years. The new technique first ages the lungfish by measuring radioactive signatures in the scales that track radioactivity from nuclear weapons testing in the 1950s and 1960s, and then having dated micro-slices of the fish scales, each slice is examined for carbon and nitrogen isotopes that unveil their food sources throughout their life. The results show that Australian lungfish shifted from food sources on river bottoms (typical of pristine streams) to food sources found in the water column, after their rivers were dammed. In addition, their scales reveal a period when the dairy industry expanded and nitrogen fertilizer in the water increased, and then nitrogen levels declined again as diary pastures dwindled. The new research was led by SAFS professor Julian Olden, and is published in River Research and Applications.


Two new species of male mouth-brooding fish described

Two new species of jawfishes (family Opistognathidae) have been described for the first time this month. These small fish have fascinating life histories, digging burrows in sandy bottoms near reefs, and relying on males to brood eggs in their mouths. Each burrow houses one fish, and they strongly defend their burrows. The first new species, Thionyi’s jawfish (Opistognathus thionyi), is found in Vitória-Trindade Chain and Fernando de Noronha Archipelago off Brazil; while the second new species, the Brazilian dusky jawfish (Opistognathus vicinus), is found off mainland Brazil. The new species are differ externally and genetically from previously described species in the same genus, which are extensively reviewed in the published research. The paper by William Smith-Vaniz of the Florida Museum of Natural History, SAFS professor Luke Tornabene, and Raphael Macieira of the Universidade Vila Velha, Brazil, appears in the journal Zookeys.

 

Thiony Simon
One of the two new species, Thiony’s jawfish.
Thiony Simon
Thiony’s jawfish peering out of its burrow off Trindade Island, Brazil.
Raphael Macieira
The second new species, the Brazilian dusky jawfish.

Little change in polar bear numbers in the Chukchi Sea

Polar bears, like other large predators, are hard to track and count, and available data is often fragmentary and difficult to piece together. Now, a new model provides estimates for key parameters for polar bears in the Chukchi Sea off north-western Alaska, by combining available data from telemetry, marking and recapturing, and counts. The model estimates that 83% of females give birth every year, that litter sizes are 2.11 per year, and that survival is about 90% for both males and females. Densities of polar bears in this region appear little changed from surveys in the 1980s, and suggest that this population contains nearly 3,000 polar bears (although the numbers could be anywhere from 1,600 to 5,900). The new research was led by Eric Regehr of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, included SAFS professor Sarah Converse among the coauthors, and was published in the journal Scientific Reports.

Location of the Chukchi Sea polar bear population, showing the core sampling area (hashed, right), locations of marked and recapture polar bears (circles) and telemetry data showing movements (black lines).

Fish processors pay higher prices after individual quotas

Individual fishing quotas have been introduced to the Pacific whiting fishery off the US west coast, involving allocating rights to fish quota to both harvesters (80%) and processors (20%) and letting individuals decide when and how to to catch and land fish. A unique dataset of prices and costs allowed researchers to examine the impact of this change on land-based processors. Such an examination has not previously been possible in any fishery because cost and income data from processors is rarely, if ever, collected. The data show that fish landings were more spread out, with landings at the major processors increasing from 38 to 72 days, and that processors ended up paying a greater share of the export price to harvesters (leading to prices averaging $0.068 per pound higher). Processing efficiency, while headed towards greater efficiency, was not clearly better, although data were limited given the small number of processors. The new research by Marie Guldin (Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA) and SAFS professor Christopher Anderson, appears in the journal Marine Resource Economics.


Strong individual rights emerge naturally in gaming experiments

Many natural resources, such as grazing lands, forests, and fisheries, can be managed either by lots of people communally (common property), by top-down regulation, or by individual rights. A new analysis shows experimentally that individual rights emerge as the preferred choice when people are given freedom to choose among different clubs that each decide how to manage part of the resource. The experiments mimicked the setup in the Northeast US Multispecies Groundfish Fishery, where there was strong opposition to allocating individual transferable quotas (ITQs) to each participant—which would have allowed each participant to catch a portion of the total catch, and lease or sell that right to others. Instead, sectors (“clubs”) were set up that each controlled a portion of the total catch, and users in each sector could decide how to fish the resulting quota. Lab experiments examined how individual users responded to this kind of setup, finding that individuals tended to move to clubs that allocated individual rights over time, because they were more profitable. However, just like in the real-life fishery, a few users continued to favor systems where fishers competed against each other rather than owning and fishing their portion of the quota. These fishers preferred the competitive nature of fishing derbies over the profitability and security of individual rights. The results suggest that it is not necessary to impose individual rights on all members harvesting a natural resource. Instead, self-identifying clubs of users can be granted considerable autonomy in how they manage a portion of the total allowable extraction, and individual rights will likely emerge naturally if they are the most profitable system. The new work by Mihoko Wakamatsu of Kyushu University, and SAFS professor Christopher Anderson, appears in the journal Ecological Economics.

In the lab experiments, profits from clubs using individual fishing rights (IQ) are consistently higher than profits from common pool competitive fishing (CP).
Over the course of the experiment, more and more participants switched from clubs with competitive fishing to clubs allocating individual fishing rights (IQs).